I am
fascinated by articles and books that discuss the writing process of other
writers - reading some of the routines and processes employed by my favorite
writers over and over again. Assuming that other readers similarly enjoy
reading about writers' routines, I answered many process related questions
about my writing in a few interviews that came out in November and December
last year. I have posted some excerpts below from the interviews. Follow the
links to read them in full - they cover a lot of ground regarding my writing
and books in general.
Excerpt from the interview with
Joyce T. Strand (Strands' Simply Tips):
Q: Do you try to deliver key
messages or to educate your readers? What is your primary goal when you write?
I remember
reading somewhere that even if you have a message to deliver as an author, you
should hide it very subtly within the story, and above all, seek to entertain.
I am not sure I have achieved that yet, but I definitely keep that advice in
mind when I write. Since I write non-fiction I guess it is acceptable to try to
educate my readers, but my goal is really for the reader to gain a new
perspective on the subject, or to ask more questions and think about the topic
even after they have finished reading the book.
I guess my
ideal goal would be that my books are read by those who have only a passing
interest or even none at all in the subject, and my book kindles a deeper
interest in them, or they feel that they have learned something unexpected from
it. Personally, I have always had absolutely no interest in astronomy, I don’t
even know where most of the major constellations are, but I happened to read
this one book on the demotion of Pluto, and it kindled this passion in me for
astronomy. Now I am hungry to read more books on the subject, and learn more
about it. That’s the power of non-fiction, and that's really what I am aiming
for, although probably not quite getting there, yet.
Q: What tips can you offer about
“being creative and productive every day?”
Well this
is a pretty vast subject, one that I feel I am only scratching the surface of.
I write about being more productive and creative on my blog, to share what
works for me and good advice that I come across elsewhere.
The most
important advice I guess I could give would be a derivation of a quote from Ira
Glass, the radio personality. As creative people, our ability is far less
developed than our taste, and so what we create may well be far worse than we
would hope for, at least initially. I used to personally get discouraged by
this, and give up. What Ira Glass suggests, and I concur, is to keep doing the
creative thing, whatever it is, no matter how bad it is. At some point, it
stops being bad, and moves to tolerable, and sometimes, it is even good. And
then, when you keep at it long enough, suddenly you are really good, and on
some lucky days, even great. Believe that that moment will come for you. And my
unique take on this advice – find whatever productivity hacks that help you to
keep at it, even when it is hard, or when the work feels hard, or
when you're sure it is intended for the stink pile. With some rare exceptions,
most of the greats in your chosen field got there because they learned how to
get through the really bad output, the really bad art, and keep going till they
got better.
Excerpt from the interview with Sara
Chatterjee (The Page-Hungry Bookworm):
As a student, what was the greatest
difficulty you faced while studying or preparing for tests?
I think the
psychological barrier is the hardest to overcome. By that I mean, if it was a
subject that I thought I was good at, like English, I usually started to
prepare enough in advance, and didn’t find studying for the test particularly
painful. But for subjects that I struggled in, just thinking about the test
made me run towards the TV remote!
I think
when you don't like or do well in a subject, the biggest difficulty is simply
in knowing where to start. Maybe this is because you don't study or learn the
material as you go, but expect to somehow figure it out a week or even days
before an exam. I know I did this a lot in school, and this was the cause of
most of my stress. On the other hand, for rare subjects where I did the
learning as the school year progressed, there was so much less aggravation
during the study prep period, and I could focus then on really preparing to
answer questions and get the most important facts committed to memory, rather
than encountering the bulk of the information for the first time.
Is there a common flaw that you have
noticed in the study pattern of most students? If so, how would you advise them
to correct that flaw and improve the study process?
That's
actually a great question! I think the most common mistake that students make
(and I myself certainly wasn’t immune to this) is to study passively. Reading
through a textbook and simply highlighting passages without taking notes or
sitting in class and not paying attention; it may seem like you are studying
but really you're not learning anything. Research has shown that highlighting
your textbook or simply reading is the worst way to learn, because weeks later,
you remember very little. And it's worse because it gives you this illusion of
having done the work.
The best
way to learn? Do some active learning. Take notes that summarize the main
points in what you are reading, answer questions on the text or take a short
quiz. Anything that requires you to put your brain through a mental workout,
manipulate the material and make it your own. This actually is harder in the
moment than passively reading, but since it speeds up learning so much, it can
actually save a student a lot of time.
Excerpt from the interview with
BookGoodies.com:
What inspires you to write?
I like to write about topics that get a hold of me, that keep coming back to me
in some way over and over till I give in and decide to spend time writing about
it. In general I am inspired to write by reading great prose, watching
inspiring movies and listening to uplifting music. Any piece of art, and I
define art quite loosely, that speaks to me and moves me, inspires me to write.
I am also inspired by other artists – those who are authentic, true to
themselves, and create something that touches my heart in some way. Growing up
in Calcutta, India, I was always surrounded by books and people who loved books
– in fact I am named after the Nobel Prize winning book of poetry from India’s
first Nobel Prize for Literature – by Rabindranath Tagore. I guess, in some
way, when my mum chose my name, she wanted me to be creative in some way, and I
ended up following that path unconsciously.
What do you think about the future
of book publishing?
I think people will always read books. The mode of how they read may change. I
do believe that more and more people will read digital books, and I definitely
believe that markets outside the US will play a bigger role than they currently
do, in terms of numbers and maybe even changing the landscape of the types of
readers used, the languages in which books are available and many other
parameters. I don’t think we have any idea of how much will change, we can only
speculate.
I also think that although democratization of content is great, discoverability
will only get harder for authors. I read somewhere that given how many books
are being written and published every day, there is no longer any room for
average. The market can only support excellent books, in the sense that they
will be the ones that get discovered and read. I totally agree with that.
Readers want a lot more now, and our job as writers is to deliver it. Word of
mouth and reader recommendations will continue to gain in importance. My own
strategy is simple, I only want to write something that excites me or pulls at
me in some way, and I want to write the best possible book I can. I hope that
with each book I write, I become a better writer.
Excerpt from the interview with
IndieView:
Do you have a writing process? If so
can you please describe it?
I usually
write my first drafts longhand, sometimes in a dedicated notebook, sometimes on
one side of used printer paper. I like to use something as everyday as
possible, so that it will signal to my mind that there is no pressure, the
writing is no big deal, I am simply jotting a few thoughts down. Once I have a
written draft, I type it up (this can take a long time or not, depending). I
try to refrain from making major edits as I type, or differentiate the edits
from the original. Invariably, at this point I realize that the draft is
dreadful, and despair that it could ever improve.
Do you outline? If so, do you do so
extensively or just chapter headings and a couple of sentences?
I usually
don’t outline till I have a draft, although for Anyone Can Get An A+ I
had jotted down a list of topics to write about, in no particular order. I am
still refining my writing process, but at the moment, once I have typed up my
draft, which for this book I did in Scrivener, I try to move the pieces around
till I am happy with the structure. Then I edit the individual chapters and
sections.
Do you listen to music while you
write? If yes, what gets the fingers tapping?
I usually
like to listen to music while writing first drafts, or doing the tedious parts
of writing such as checking references and compiling the bibliography. I
usually edit in silence, but it’s not a completely hard rule. I also listen to
music when I am writing in a public place, to minimize distractions. Each book
usually has a different soundtrack. For my book on cluster munitions, I
listened to Celtic music as a nod to the location of the signing of the
Convention. Anyone Can Get An A+ was written while I listened to
classical music (I played Handel, Mozart and Beethoven on a loop), and was
edited to Coldplay and Gregorian Chants.